In about four quick months, my babe has confused her attraction from zoo animals and Yo Gabba Gabba to all things angel and pink. I don’t accept a botheration with princesses or pink, per se (we did acquaint Santa what to bring, afterwards all), but rather the letters and cerebral accoutrements that Cinderella is accretion about in that behemothic black gown.
Disney princesses are activated to be beautiful, but they’re aloof addition abundance of the Barbie Complex area the characters my babe best generally surrounds herself with are thin-waisted, doe-eyed, straight-haired adorableness queens. It’s not as if my babe is absent to that, because she tells me assorted times a day that her princesses are “SO BEAUTIFUL” and that she herself is “SOOOOO PRETTY” back she dives into her Disney Angel Dress-Up Trunk.
For the record, absent to be a angel isn’t a bad thing. I don’t abhorrence princesses, and I affiance I’m not autograph this while cackling berserk as a alpha accumulation of berserk apples marinates on the stove. I’m not actuality to acquaint you that the $200 Disney Ultimate Dream Castle you’ll be advantageous off until March is ambience your adolescent on a activity aisle captivated by vanity and babyish purse-dogs called Mr. Snuggles. It’s not, unless you let it.
Yes, women can be admirable and glamorous, but the media (Disney Princesses included) generally presents a actual attenuated ambit of those two characteristics while apathy a host of others that are abundant added important: intelligence, strength, leadership, etc. … basically all the characteristics that accomplish Prince Charming, Prince Charming.
To Disney’s credit, princesses accept acquired back Snow White was aboriginal alien in 1937. Disney’s contempo crop of changeable leads are absolute and independent, able of creating aerial castles of hate-ice while singing adorable ballads about not giving a applesauce about society’s aged prejudices against aberrant powers. Alike if they still advance their waif-thin figures, at atomic their characters backpack some abyss and they all acquisition conservancy from their affairs in article added than a tall, handsome, affluent Prince So-and-So.
I apprehend I’m oversimplifying the belief of Snow White, Cinderella and Aurora, but accouchement are able of alone so abundant rational anticipation apropos gender roles. They all accept admirable traits, but no amount how compassionate and absolutely optimistic Sleeping Adorableness is, every time Prince Phillip shows up to save the day with the Power of Making Out, it doesn’t allege abundant to changeable empowerment.
Disney is a big culprit of blame these ethics on kids, but they’re not the alone one. Alike if I did acquisition a way to auspiciously off every Disney angel (cue the maniacal cackling), my babe is still activity to accept arbitrary adorableness standards shoved bottomward her throat.
My wife and I didn’t set out to accomplish our babe a princess-in-training. On the contrary, from the alpha we capital to abstain pigeon-holing her into such adamant gender stereotypes. I grew up at a time back boys played with Ninja Turtles and G.I. Joes and girls played with Barbies and babyish dolls. It wasn’t until I became an developed that I accomplished how big of an appulse arena with a accumulating of muscled-up turtles had on my own anatomy image. I aloof accustomed that men were over-bulked and able and women were airy and beautiful. I never already questioned what Master Splinter was putting in the breakfast pizza.
Disney princesses are a abstraction of our society’s attitudes against women at the time, and you alone accept to watch “Maleficent” to see how things accept afflicted over the aftermost 50-plus years. That’s a footfall in the appropriate direction, but as with best things, adamant parenting will win out over the media’s influence. So appropriate now, my babe is all-in on princesses and so am I, if for no added acumen than to appearance her that there’s a accomplished lot added to Sleeping Adorableness than a blush dress.
Follow Chris on Twitter area he says things about things.